Posts Tagged ‘Cycling Gear’

RSP LAA883 Light

November 14th, 2009
Cateye EL-410 with Band Mount

Cateye EL-410

As the daily commute is getting darker and darker, I have been more and more concious about the drawbacks of my current commuting light, the Cateye EL-410.

My commute is only 4km each way, but some of the roads are pretty rough with some hefty potholes and badly set drains. As the bike is subjected to periods of strong vibration, it highlights a glaringly obvious problem with the EL-410; and that’s the quick release band mount. I thought that having a quick release band was a good idea at first, but having to constantly tilt the light back up every 500 yards is a real pain in the arse, especially with lobster hand winter gloves on. I went to the Cateye website and found that they supply the H-33 Commuter Bracket for the EL-410 as an accessory; so I purchased one to steady the light. The bracket is excellent and does its job very well, but the amount of light from the EL-410 is still pretty diffuse and disappointing. As such, I was looking for a cheap replacement “be seen” light with a sturdy mount… and so far I believe I found one.

I bought the Raleigh Special Products LAA883 on ebay for £16.99 with free delivery. There was a few people selling it for less, but every time I followed the link, they were out of stock (don’t you just hate it when shops do that!). The light arrived last weekend, and I slotted in the 4 X AAA batteries and, as advised on Bike Radar, I greased the seal before closing to ensure a water tight fit.

The first thing that strikes me is that the light feels quite solid and weighty as does the mount. The mount is excellent compared to the Cateye band system and can still be removed easily with gloves using the thumb screw. The bracket is shimmed with two pieces of rubber and the sturdy thumb screw bites down on the clamp with reassuring tension. The light unit then slides into the slot on the top of the mount, and here’s where you have to be careful. Sometimes it feels like its been slotted home fully but it isn’t; so make sure you give it a final push, and pull forward to test it has been seated properly.

RSP LAA883 Front Light

RSP LAA883 Front Light

While riding the light stays absolutely solid, and there’s no more slowly rotating round the handlebars as the bike vibrates. It has two modes, constant and flashing and run time is meant to be  150 hours on flash, and I have no reason to doubt that. The light itself is very bright and easily lights up road signs from 100 + yards away but doesn’t dazzle the rider. It may be my over active imagination, but I noticed more drivers reacting to my presence further away and some looked a bit dazzled when they came closer. Not a bad result for a £17 5 LED light.

The beam pattern has a good centre focus with four light bands emanating from the centre in an ‘X’ shape. The bands are a bit useless, but they do give some extra light left and right. Although the light is very bright, its a little dim for unlit lanes and bike paths; however it would work if you were going slow enough.

The body lens, which is placed 20mm back into the body, also throws a large amount of light outward, especially onto the rider and bike to help side visibility. Upon further inspection, the body lens isn’t just a clear section that runs flat along the body like the Cateye. The lens flares out towards the front, which is probably why light easily travels backwards and onto the rider.

Flared Body Lens Projects Light Backwards

Flared Body Lens Projects Light Backwards

All in all this is an excellent front light for the money. Its bright, sturdy, good run time and very cheap. I’ve only ridden with it a few times in the rain, but one shower was very heavy and the light seemed fine, thanks to the rubberised switch cover and greased seal. The only drawback I have noticed is the vagueness of the light’s click when seated in the bracket, but as long as you double check before riding, that shouldn’t be a problem.

So; if you are looking for a cheap ‘be seen’ commuter light the RSP LAA833 is definitely recommended.

Cyclehoop’s

November 4th, 2009

Saw these  Cyclehoop’s on a post from Hong Kong Fixed today. At first glance they look pretty cool, and are an excellent idea for expanding limited bike parking, but I do see some problems.

Firstly; you could only install them somewhere that the council wouldn’t rip them off what ever you installed them. Secondly, they appear to be held on with shear bolts. The problem with bolts, as opposed to welds, is that bolts can be drilled or tapped out pretty easily making the removal of the hoop a distinct possibility.

Still; I think they are a great idea, especially for small companies or schools that wish to expand bike parking easily, but I would like to see how much they cost before believing.

Reflectorphobia

October 17th, 2009
BReflector

The Horror

For a while now I have been contemplating UK law with regards to riding at night. The CTC has a great article by Chris Juden on the current lighting regulations which, I would strongly advise you to read before cycling after sunset.

For this article, I will avoid going through the details of each item required under UK law. If you are interested in the details you should read through Chris’s article on the CTC’s website. For now I will summarise what equipment is required:

  • One constant or flashing white coloured front lamp.
  • One constant or flashing red coloured rear lamp.
  • One rear reflector, coloured red and conforming to BS6102/2.
  • Four pedal reflectors, coloured amber and conforming to BS6102/2.

The first two regulations listed make sense, as everybody knows that the most important part of night cycling is to attract the attention of drivers in order to avoid getting hit. Additionally; if you want to spend the extra cash, its nice to see the potholes in the dark from more than four feet away before they wreck your rims. The source of my reflectorphobia is of course the third and fourth regulations listed.

I am not sure when my reflectorphobia started, but I suspect that it was around 1979 when the BMX craze first hit Scotland. Until then reflectors were ‘cool’, and it was a point of pride to have as many as humanly possible on your bike. But BMX was different. It wasn’t about cheap tat on your machine, it was more about how ‘rad’ you could be, and what you could do on it. At this point reflectors became ‘uncool’.

With this in mind it was very risky to mount reflectors on your BMX as you would get called reflector boy, or even worse; your BMX would  be branded a poof machine. As such; no respected BMX rider would dare have reflectors mounted anywhere on their bike. Not only this, but “having a reflector fly off in the middle of a session could be dangerous to the rider and those watching”; which was the excuse used to persuade your parents to let you take them off.

Then, during the 80′s, my bike obsession grew into that of a roadie. At this point reflectors were nothing more than weight and drag, and with my new found teenage roadie invincibility mindset they were decreed to be totally unnecessary. Besides, if Bernard Hinault didn’t have them, then neither would a highly competent pro level teenage cyclist like me (ah, the ignorance of youth).

During the 90′s mountain biking was the new thing, and once again there was no point to reflectors. Even though I could still take the bike on the road at night, they were a pain in the arse to take back off, and the mounting screw always rusted solid after a couple of months. Additionally; they were still uncoo’.

Today, I have sold off my road bikes and BMX’s. I now have two fixies and a mountain bike, and none of them have reflectors. I keep telling myself that riding at night requires them, and I can see the point of fitting pedal reflectors at least. They do grab attention of the driver using the power of their lights, and from far away. But somehow they are still uncool and still a sign of a complete novice cyclist, which is a view now ingrained in me from a young age. I have always thought that this is my own personal character flaw but the strange thing is; I am beginning to think that I am not alone.

I have read many articles on the subject stressing the good and bad, and they all argue the same practical and technical pros and cons, but they all seem to miss the point. Most of the arguments  against fitting reflectors also seem weak, and I am beginning to suspect its a sign of closet reflectorphobia.

To me, reflectors will always be uncool until someone makes the killer product that looks good, functions well and stands the test of time. But for some reason they don’t exist. Why is that? Why are they all cheap pieces of plastic tat? Surely a product that is fitted to every bike at the point of sale, and is required by law in most countries should, by now, be developed to its full potential. I find this very strange, but strangely reassuring from a personal point of view.

Every other piece of equipment on a bicycle has been developed to the point of exhaustion by thousands of manufacturers. Its finely honed for its purpose and displays all the characteristics demanded by its function and environment, with millions spent every year on R&D and testing in an attempt to capture the elusive market share and build a brand name second to none… unless its uncool.

Why is it that SRAM or Shimano haven’t released the sub gram reflector, with titanium aero casings, adaptive  optics and quick release mount? Why no integrated solar panel that charges your lights while parked? Its also something else to make out of carbon, but still no one has! By now you would think that manufacturers would have strived to find that killer solution for a product that not only appeals to the safety conscious cyclist of the 21st century, but is required by law.

Every year, new ideas flood the cycling market in an attempt to push forward design, reliability and function. Everything gets stronger, faster, lighter, brighter and of course, stiffer. Why is it that people will spend thousands on products that enhance the aforementioned criteria but not a single penny on one that is required by law?

I guess the entire bike industry has reflectorphobia, but at least I feel more normal.

Chris King Precision Components

October 17th, 2009

Great new Interbike TV video from David Bernstein of the Fredcast. A fantastic overview of Chris Kings components, including their new Swift Road hubs and a sneak preview of their very classy Cielo frames. I so want one… or two… or three. Nice one David, best video yet.

Bike Radar Interbike Videos

October 14th, 2009

At last the Interbike videos from Bike Radar are up, and looking good.

http://eurobike.bikeradar.com/

James Martin Let Off

October 14th, 2009

What a surprise eh? The Press Complaints Commission has decided that James Martin did not breach their code of practice when he wrote his now infamous anti cyclist review of the Tesla roadster in his Mail on Sunday column. I guess we only pursue ethnic minority Muslims for hate speech in the UK.

Full Story here

Crud Roadracer Mudguard

September 29th, 2009

Bought a set of Crud Roadracer mudguards last week, and they finally arrived today. They were intended for my Giant Bowery commuter which has no mudguard eyelets on the rear , and as I had to change the fork out, none on the front. The bike runs continental GP4000s road tyres and according to the sales patter should fit ok.

I sat down this morning and started to fit these new guards. The instructions were a bit short and non descriptive, but after 10minutes I got the idea and started to set them up. The front guard went on ok and gave a few millimeters clearance from the tyre. Then I had to stick on the brushes that stop the guard from chattering which was my first disappointment. You see, I was under the impression that the brushes only contacted the rim if the guard moved towards it. The truth is that they rub the rim constantly! What a pisser! Anyway, I can live with a slight but constant brushing sound.

I moved onto the rear were the trouble really began. Following the instructions, I setup the guard and tried to mount it to the bike. I set the mudguard stay mounting brackets down at the dropouts and secured them, only to find that the mounting stays were not long enough to reach the bracket! So i slid the bracket up the seat stays more and More until they reached. Trouble is, the mudguard stays are now pushing the back of the guard away from the bike, causing the flimsy mudguard to sag at the 12 o’clock position, bringing it into contact with the tyre. So I messed around with the setup for at least 3 hours and still it wont fit…  Bummer. So i am now asking myself, whats the point of a product that is designed fro winter riding, that doesn’t fit most riders winter tyre choice of 23c or 25c? I mean what use are they? Sigh…

I suppose I could send them back, but to be honest the amount of hassle involved with trying to persuade the seller that  “being completely shit” is a valid reason for return will just annoy me even more.

So I guess once again I am the lazy, peeved off victim of more crap engineering, bad design and blatant marketing lies about compatibility. And its that last point that sticks in my craw. If Crud had been honest and said, “wont fit slot dropouts” or “only 700 X 18c tyres” things wouldn’t be so bad, and i would have just bought something else. But to willingly say they will fit 700 X 23 tyres when quite clearly they are going to have some trouble doing so, is the kind of lies that puts customers off there future products.

To summarise, if you have slotted dropouts, 700 X 23 tyres, or any sense; buy race blades instead. Wish I had.

Knog Solid State Ulock

September 25th, 2009

Great preview here from Urbanvelo about Knogs prototype solid state u-lock.

Apparently, its opened using a solid state key which involves no batteries, and will retail for around $150 US. It looks excellent, as you would expect from Knog.